Re: Is NPL DFSG complient or not?
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:
>>> "Adam" == Adam P Harris <apharris@burrito.onshore.com> writes:
Adam> Personally, I consider it the package maintainer's duty to
Adam> comply with license minutae, not Debian's. I'm positioned to
Adam> offer every version of some MPL'd s/w by virtue of CVS.
> You shall find that not all developers are in that happy
> position. And you shall also find, I think, that most developers
> were also not aware of this requirement when they sign up -- and I
> think this is a requirement that is too harsh on developers in
> general.
> Why can't Debian keep older versions?
I agree we should, but I also have to deal with present reality.
Adam> Since I can do that, I can comply with the license. Therefore
Adam> Debian is in compliance with the license. Therefore, the
Adam> package can go in "main".
> Umm, nope. If debian is ditributing it, Debian is responsible
> as well (when are things that easy?). I do not think passing the
> buck to individual developers is the way to go.
Waitaminnit. I'm a registered Debian developer. What is this
"debian" entity who is above me? There is no such entity, legally.
As the official pkg maintainer, I think I can represent Debian for the
sake of this license for this package.
I agree it sucks that I have to do this (although it's not too much of
a hardship), I just see it as a necessary "gotcha" to the MPL. People
packaging MPL pkgs should be aware of this, and willing to fill the
gap. Otherwise, don't package it.
Your position, as I see it, is that MPL s/w cannot be packaged at all.
Which I don't think is a defensable position, just on the legal basis,
in my admittedly foggy, home-spun interpretation of it. Please look
over the expat package (you'll need libxmltok1 also) and tell me
exactly *how* it is unable to go to main, i.e., what clause of the MPL
do I violate?
> manoj I lost my drive late last year, and my backup for /home
> was corrupt, so it is merely luck that I have my old CVS repository
Well, disaster is always possible. So long as one defensably can say,
"I made every reasonable effort to comply."
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: