Re: Linking Question -- Static vs. Dynamic

To: "Fulgham, Brent/SCO" <BFulgham@CH2M.com>
Cc: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Linking Question -- Static vs. Dynamic
From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
Date: 04 Aug 1998 01:43:49 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sojdqgqi.fsf@McKesson.com>
In-reply-to: Jules Bean's message of "Mon, 3 Aug 1998 22:42:34 +0100 (BST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980803224057.10129A-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk>

>>>>> "Jules" == Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk> writes:
    Jules> a) Wrong forum.  Maybe debian-mentors...

Jules is right but,

	gcc -o ... *.o -Wl,-static -lsomestaticlib -Wl,-dynamic

should do what you want.

-- 
Stephen
---
Linux - the Frodo Baggins of Computing.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Linking Question -- Static vs. Dynamic
  - From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Dual PII problem
Next by Date: Re: SAL and Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Linking Question -- Static vs. Dynamic
Next by thread: Login source code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread