Re: Package maintainer script policy.
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 07:12:22PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > It's not an issue of advantage IMO. It's an issue of is there any
> > reason that it's Wrong to use an ELF binary as a postinst. There's a
> > danger to it, but the same danger exists in packages which call some
> > form of configuration binaries.
> There's also the simple point that policy says it should be a script.
> And it's not a script.
> And there's no reason for it to not be a script.
In fact, there is a technical reason to avoid executables in packaging
Installing a package with "dpkg --root=" would fail across architectures
(yeah, I do this for Debian/Hurd). But in this special case this would be
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org