Re: Package maintainer script policy.
Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It's not an issue of advantage IMO. It's an issue of is there any
> reason that it's Wrong to use an ELF binary as a postinst. There's a
> danger to it, but the same danger exists in packages which call some
> form of configuration binaries.
There's also the simple point that policy says it should be a script.
And it's not a script.
And there's no reason for it to not be a script.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org