Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <email@example.com> writes:
Santiago> On 3 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I still don't think we can report bugs against packages merely
>> for using bash.
Santiago> Neither do I, if we talk about normal bugs, but wishlist
Santiago> bugs are always a good thing if they come with a patch. If
Santiago> someone sends me a patch which allows a #!/bin/bash script
Santiago> to be #!/bin/sh, I will surely consider it a desirable
Santiago> thing and will accept it.
And I may not. Any reports against cvs-buildpackage shall be
rejected, as they have before. Bash is still an essential package,
and is still referred to in the policy manual. If this has to be
changed, we need to ratify the constitution, so that I and the tech
committee (along with others who have shown signs of volunteering)
can do something about the policy manual.
Dictating policy via the BTS is not something I espouse.
"A box of punchcards could theoretically store 240,000 bytes of
information, and usually stored less than 80,000. Think about it."
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org