Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <email@example.com> writes:
>> Oh, wonderful. Yes, it is broken. But just like all the
>> popular browsers out there, we should try and accept broken scripts
Clint> If you mean the interpretation of bad HTML, I must disagree
Clint> strongly. Web browsers should be completely intolerant of
In your (arguably) laudable single minded devotion to
technical purity, you are missing the point of HTML browsers and the
web: information transfer.
When I write HTML, I validate it against a standard DTD, for
that ensures maximal dissemincation of my data; however, when I use a
browser, I interested in the information the author has to convey,
not their expertisae in coding HTML.
So, when I read my sister-in-law's page about the family and
pictures of the kids, I want to see what she has written, even if she
does not know HTML and uses claris front page that produces
excruciatingly bad HTML.
If you foist a browser that fails to display that in some
misguided "pure HTML" evangelism, that browser is broken, and so is
any distribution that makes it a default.
Reliability. *RELIABILITY*. Fault tolerance. Pedantic broswers
that whimper and fail at the first ill formed HTML are unreliable,
and should be discarded in ivory towers.
This is not the university, people, we are putting together a
real world distribution; and while our HTML pages and scripts are
held to the highest standards, our interoreters and browsers need to
be more fault tolerant.
"It is easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org