[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should portslave divert or rename pppd & rlogin?



On Thu, Jul 30, 1998 at 09:26:49PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> Hi..
> 
> I just started packaging portslave (as announced 15 days ago), and I've run
> into a bit of a problem.  
> 
> Portslave is a radius client which also acts as a getty.  It comes with a
> modified pppd which can also authenticate over radius (for PAP connections),
> and a version of rlogin (not sure why).  It can also replace in.fingerd with
> its own program that will show users logged in over radius.
> 
> My questions is, how should I handle this?  Rename the pppd it provides to
> something like pppd.portslave, or divert pppd (if there is one installed
> allready), or even conflict with the pppd package?
> 
> How about finger, and rlogin?


Hrm, since no one seems to care right now, I guess I'll just pick one of the
above, and let people who disagree file a bug report.. :)

Attachment: pgpr2pCZrIs4P.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: