Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh

To: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:47:56 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980731154756.38535@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 35C21981.CA1EEB7C@livenet.net>; from Shaleh on Fri, Jul 31, 1998 at 03:22:41PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 87k94ufsxm.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 19980731173536.B12446@gondor.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 87zpdqdppc.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 19980731132136.B12307@scowler.ml.org> <[🔎] 87ww8tevnu.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 19980731143314.B12898@scowler.ml.org> <[🔎] 19980731145715.04917@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] 19980731150557.A13262@scowler.ml.org> <[🔎] 19980731150730.30841@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] 35C21981.CA1EEB7C@livenet.net>

Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net> wrote:
> To my knowledge we use ash on our boot disks.  No I do not think we
> should rip bash out from under everyone.  But my cron jobs sure to fly
> better.  And boot feels happier.  A older machine with less mem would
> probably benefit even more.

Sure, I'm looking forward to doing this on a number of my machines,
too.  Especially one that's cron-job-bound.

But that's not the same thing as making it the default for everyone..
Even if we do that eventually, it's not right for slink.

-- 
Raul

--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
Next by Date: Re: SUMMARY: pentium optimized debian discussion
Previous by thread: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
Next by thread: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread