Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh

To: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
From: Steve Lamb <morpheus@calweb.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 11:58:50 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980731115850.11595@calweb.com>
Reply-to: Steve Lamb <morpheus@calweb.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980731145715.04917@test.legislate.com>; from Raul Miller on Fri, Jul 31, 1998 at 02:57:15PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 19980731151805.A5442@gondor.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 87k94ufsxm.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 19980731173536.B12446@gondor.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 87zpdqdppc.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 19980731132136.B12307@scowler.ml.org> <[🔎] 87ww8tevnu.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 19980731143314.B12898@scowler.ml.org> <[🔎] 19980731145715.04917@test.legislate.com>

Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> wrote:
> I don't recall us ever saying /bin/sh is always bash. That is a naive
> assumption to make on the part of anyone. I cannot think of a platform
> other than Linux whereupon that could be considered a good bet.

    FreeBSD, IIRC.  At least the earlier ones.

-- 
             Steve C. Lamb             | Opinions expressed by me are not my
    http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus    | employer's.  They hired me for my
CC: from news not wanted or appreciated| skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

References:
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Prev by Date: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
Next by Date: Re: Uploaded gtkmm 0.9.11-1 (source i386) to master
Previous by thread: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
Next by thread: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread