Re: Fixing *other* libtool problem?
On Tue, 28 Jul 1998 fog@irfmn.mnegri.it wrote:
> Assuming this is a patch to the libtool package what about making
> a modified libtool package to be used by debian developer instead
> of the standard one? (I think is just a couple of line changes to the
> original debian/rules.) I vote for a libtool-debianized package.
>
Sounds like a sensible plan to me.
But, does anyone know why Gordon did it this way? I know him - in the
sense that I have been on the debian-hurd list from the beginning - and he
comes across as someone who has reasons for his actions. Has anyone
emailed him about it? It is possible that our changes could be merged
upstream (possibly as an option...)
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: