Re: Hamm rescue disk failed on me
On Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 08:57:18PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 199807220734.JAA16192@josephine.sis.pasteur.fr> you wrote:
> >
> > Known problem. Discussed several times on linux-kernel and the aic7xxx
> > mailing list.
>
> > Kernel 2.0.34's new Adaptec 5.0 driver broke several Adaptec cards
> > (5.1-pre, not yet in any kernel, repaired some of the bugs). I've
> > submitted it as a bug in hamm but it has been closed, against my opinion.
>
> What I am going to do at the moment is to make a separate kernel package with
> aic7xxx 5.1.0beta in it, then the boot-floppies maintainer can simply make
> a separate image just like tecra.
Why does it have to be a separate image? Does it break anything, as
"tecra" does? (AFAIK, tecra kernels doesn't boot on several non-tecra
machines).
Thanks,
--
Enrique Zanardi ezanardi@ull.es
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: