Re: Intent to package: GGlyph
Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:
> Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:
> > > Most of the remainder had GPL licenses. But I was shocked to find
> > > that most had *only* GPL licenses. If that was really the case,
> > > then these should go in main.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> James Troup <james@nocrew.org> wrote:
> > Eh? Clearly not. The entire point of contrib is for DFSG-free
> > software which depends on something not in main. As all the packages
> > you listed below do.
>
> Yes, that's the purpose of contrib. That doesn't mean that it
> satisfies the GPL however.
Yes, I'm aware of your objections; but that's not what you said. You
said they should be in main, which is what upset me, as it's clearly
not happening.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~ http://yawn.nocrew.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: