Re: Debian i386 freeze
- To: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@wiggy.ml.org>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Debian i386 freeze
- From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 16:58:46 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980717165846.19585@test.legislate.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>, Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@wiggy.ml.org>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 35AFA7AE.61E08F49@verisim.com>; from Brian White on Fri, Jul 17, 1998 at 03:36:14PM -0400
- References: <[🔎] 31925.900702698@hands.com> <[🔎] 35AFA7AE.61E08F49@verisim.com>
Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com> wrote:
> I've decided to leave the kde stuff in contrib for Hamm. We can change it
> for Slink if it is deemed necessary at the time.
Considering the confusion the kde folks have brought to bear on this
issue, this is probably an acceptable tact to take. However, I'd like
to see something like the following in the hamm release notes:
"CONTRIB" IS NOT A PART OF DEBIAN
NOTE: It's not clear whether or not we have the right to distribute
kde binaries. This is a general problem involving GPL'd code where
the binaries require certain kinds of non-free code so it may be that
other code in contrib has similar problems. Please be careful about
deciding whether or not you wish to distribute these binaries.
On the one hand, other linux distributors (such as Red Hat and SuSE)
are distributing these binaries as if they were free software. On
the other hand, just because other people are doing it doesn't make
it right. On the third hand, the KDE folk have implied that it's
ok to distribute these kind of binaries. On the fourth hand, they've
never addressed the underlying issue: their license requires that
all the code which went into the binaries be distributed under terms
where you can modify the source code and redistribute the result, but
they're using Qt, and Qt forbids such use.
We'd like to see this issue resolved, but only the KDE folks can
do this. The public statements by the KDE folks lead us to believe
that they intend to do something to make KDE binaries legally
redistributable as free software so we are not taking any action
at this time. However, in good conscience we cannot pretend that
this issue does not exist. Take care.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: