Re: intent to package x2x
Steve Dunham wrote:
>James Troup <james@nocrew.org> writes:
>> Adrian Bridgett <adrian.bridgett@zetnet.co.uk> writes:
>
>> > The search finally turned up good - xpropsel was the name. I'll have a look
>> > before deciding whether to package it up or not.
>
>> It's already packaged too.
>
>The "x2x" package even recommends it. Although I'm not exactly sure
>why x2x recommends xpropsel, since x2x automatically propogates
>selections by itself.
The reason "x2x" and "propsel" suggest each other is because if you select
one, you should know about the other too; they do similar things, and you
may have unwittingly picked the wrong one. Each package's description
also mentions the other and tries to help you decide which one to use.
--
Charles Briscoe-Smith
White pages entry, with PGP key: <URL:http://alethea.ukc.ac.uk/wp?95cpb4>
PGP public keyprint: 74 68 AB 2E 1C 60 22 94 B8 21 2D 01 DE 66 13 E2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: