Re: x and non-x binary in 1 packet ?
On Sun, Jul 12, 1998 at 08:18:11PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Now I'm wondering how to package this. slang-source is a binary-all
> package, that's clear.
Agreed.
> But the libs normaly are an essential part of jed (without you can edit,
> but nothing more...)
> I would prefer to make one binary package with jed,xjed and the .slc (lib)
> files, but where to put it ? In /editor/ and /x11/ at the same time ?
> Or should I split into jed.deb, xjed.deb, jed-lib.deb and
> jed-lib-source.deb ?
I'd say make two binary packages, one non-X + .slc files, and one with just
xjed that depends on the non-X one.
I say this because I've got a couple of non-X (or should be non-X) systems
where I've got jed installed precisely because it's lightweight. Having to
have xlib6g is an annoyance (though not a terribly big one).
On the other hand, we used to have emacs and emacs-nox, and those eventually
got merged because it was determined that the xlib wasn't too big a demand
to make.
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: