Re: Soft we should probably have: maxwell

To: Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es>
Cc: Alex Yukhimets <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu>, Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Soft we should probably have: maxwell
From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@mygale.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:56:31 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 13733.55103.912885.522919@bylbo.nowhere.earth>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980708181416.B9387@molec3.dfis.ull.es>
References: <[🔎] 35A3A46D.7098F4CD@livenet.net> <[🔎] E0ytxgn-0007SU-00@jessica> <[🔎] 19980708181416.B9387@molec3.dfis.ull.es>

Enrique Zanardi writes:
 > But you can try using g++272, until the upstream maintainers do the

... which is not our default C++ compiler any more... I guess that'll
break auto-compilation, but that'd still be better than nothing ;)

 > transition to "standard c++".

-- 
Yann Dirson    <ydirson@mygale.org> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
isp-email:   <ydirson@a2points.com> |     support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email:   <dirson@debian.org> |         more powerful, more stable !
http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/     | Check <http://www.debian.org/>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Soft we should probably have: maxwell
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: Soft we should probably have: maxwell
  - From: <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu>(Alex Yukhimets)
- Re: Soft we should probably have: maxwell
  - From: Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es>

Prev by Date: Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before releasing Hamm
Next by Date: [OT] Open Source? No. Free (Source)!
Previous by thread: Re: Soft we should probably have: maxwell
Next by thread: Re: Soft we should probably have: maxwell
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread