Re: The XDM trap

To: servis@purdue.edu
Cc: cas@taz.net.au, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The XDM trap
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 23:31:42 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980707233142.V786@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: servis@purdue.edu, cas@taz.net.au, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 35a2e6a41cee002@herald.cc.purdue.edu>; from servis@purdue.edu on Tue, Jul 07, 1998 at 10:30:27PM -0500
References: <[🔎] 19980707220531.T786@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] 35a2e6a41cee002@herald.cc.purdue.edu>

servis@purdue.edu <servis@purdue.edu> wrote:
> Why couldn't /etc/X11/xdm/Xreset be used as a place to do the failure
> counting?  It gets executed after the X server ends(fails).  

That's a better idea.

There's still the question though: is this the right kind of 
approach.

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: The XDM trap
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: The XDM trap
  - From: servis@purdue.edu

Prev by Date: Re: .so and .a libs, tcl, postgres = in over my head
Next by Date: Re: .so and .a libs, tcl, postgres = in over my head
Previous by thread: Re: The XDM trap
Next by thread: Re: The XDM trap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread