Re: intent to package: licq
On Jul 06, Philip Hands decided to present us with:
>
> It will have to be a source only package then. Unless the
> author fancies actually licensing the distribution of the
> binaries, under something other than the GPL.
Hmm what's the policy for source-only packages now? Do I clone
the qmail package? The DFSG mentions code must be distributable
in binary format; so this would have to go to non-free? And then
what happens with the kde .deb's?
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
Howling to the moonlight on a hot summer night...
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:lalo@webcom.com
pgp key in the web page
Free Software Union -- http://www.fslu.org
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: