Re: emacs19-el standard priority?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 1 Jul 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
>
> > In bo, emacs, which was "standard", suggested emacs-el, which was just
> > optional.
> >
> > Now emacs19 is standard, suggests emacs19-el, but emacs19-el is also
> > of "standard" priority.
>
> Hmm, I wouldn't have expected the -el packages to be standard, but I
> just noticed that my emacs20-el is standard too.
>
> Of course, along those lines, it looks like both emacs20 and emacs19
> are standard, and that along with their -el packages makes a standard
> hamm install *much* larger than bo.
Yes, this has been already fixed. emacs20 is now optional and emacs19
is the standard one [ According to people who have tried both, this
is the best thing to do since emacs19 seems to be more stable ].
But we have still the issue about emacs19-el, which was not standard
in bo and would make a standard hamm install somewhat larger than bo.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNZpiPCqK7IlOjMLFAQGX+QP9HoSSIuk8TYEm0YkFFKEbjVvvYsqJGIoj
vVtonyD7wHVqWpjoH/nqKxR5eR6nqwDhte+RS8JfOi9SVHUlKsJJRrAElEwLkiIO
wR0e81KA5jo5d5PcM2X7hUkSUOooNgCJcZh9BvsEPZoeqVVLw4Bg1ERiCqSVXmSD
lRY1PFAaGFg=
=vaC+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: