Re: emacs19-el standard priority?
Santiago Vila <email@example.com> writes:
> In bo, emacs, which was "standard", suggested emacs-el, which was just
> Now emacs19 is standard, suggests emacs19-el, but emacs19-el is also
> of "standard" priority.
Hmm, I wouldn't have expected the -el packages to be standard, but I
just noticed that my emacs20-el is standard too.
Of course, along those lines, it looks like both emacs20 and emacs19
are standard, and that along with their -el packages makes a standard
hamm install *much* larger than bo.
Rob Browning <firstname.lastname@example.org> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org