Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...

[James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>]

Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:

> The current problem can be solved by a version suffix and therefore
> does not require an epoch.

Eh?  Almost any version-number problem can be solved by a version
suffix[1].  What's your point?  Are you saying we don't need epochs?
Or anyone using epochs is opting for the ``poor'' solution?

[1] 2.9.1-0.1.this.is.really.2.8.1 anyone?

-- 
James
~Yawn And Walk North~                                  http://yawn.nocrew.org/


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org