Re: RFC: worth packaging apache-modperl ?
--On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 12:39 am -0400 "Dan Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>
wrote:
> Will do, then. This leaves me one big question, though. This is going
> to require mixing four things:
> (A) apache 1.3.0
> (B) netgod's massive apache diff
> (C) mod_perl upstream -- probably going to version it by date and use
> the CVS tree instead of the rarer new releases.
> (D) My own diff for this project.
>
> Any ideas on how to handle this? dpkg still doesn't handle multiple
> source tarballs so I'll probably have to make an orig containing apache
> and mod_perl,, and just use netgod's diff as the basis for mine. Or I
> could apply his diff to the orig since it's not my work, and work on
> top of that.
>
> Slightly puzzled.
Personally, I considered this option as well, and decided that it was
probably not worth the effort, since they are 'so close' to having proper
DSO support.
I suspect that most people who really need mod_perl in a hurry have the
expertise to compile it themselves (its pretty straight-forward now).
However, if you do want to do it, email me and I'll tell you what I think
needs doing..
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: