Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem
Jim <email@example.com> wrote:
> Are you unhappy with the result (hamm)? I'm not...
I'm not unhappy with hamm, but I am unhappy that we didn't have any
releases between bo and hamm.
Mind you, I've come up with workarounds, but I also had some service
outages that could have been avoided if I could have kept a clean
distinction between production use and hamm unstable.
Also, I have one machine still running bo with a hand-built copy of
perl 5.004 (which was installed before bo-upgrades existed). I'm
going to have to burn a weekend bringing that back on track with
hamm without losing anything essential...
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com