Re: Documentation Freeness (Re: Packages to be removed from hamm)
Joost Witteveen <email@example.com> wrote:
> OK, that may well be true. But still the text of the GPL is clear:
> you are not allowed to change it, whether you change the name of your
> cahnged version or not.
You're saying that all those people who have licensed their software
under modified versions of the GPL are breaking the law? Do you have any
basis for this statement?
I think there's a very strong distinction between changing the license
under which software is released, and changing the corresponding
Raul, wondering if this has anything at all to do with release critical bugs
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com