Re: [Off-topic] Licenses (Was: How to reratify the DFSG ?)
"Rev. Joseph Carter" <knghtbrd@earthlink.net> writes:
> This should also make GPL mods to Mozilla a no-no since that would mean that
> Mozilla would have to be GPL. Mozilla is NOT GPL. However RMS said GPL
> patches to Mozilla was still possible. Why is it possible for Mozilla and
> not for Qt?
The author of code can make it available under more than one licence -
GPL or NPL for example. Troll tech has instead concocted their own
licence which is self-contradictory.
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: