Re: Size of a du index for packages (Complete index = 74 K)

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Cc: deity@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Size of a du index for packages (Complete index = 74 K)
From: Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: 01 Jun 1998 18:20:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] q9k971m6va.fsf@fphp16.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
In-reply-to: Manoj Srivastava's message of "30 May 1998 23:49:33 -0500"
References: <199803090951.EAA10662@netgod.net> <q9af82my4d.fsf@fphp16.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <19980528132120.R3613@test.legislate.com> <q9lnrklyxw.fsf@fphp16.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <19980530090803.S3613@test.legislate.com> <87d8cvhwo2.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> 	I think if the untrimmed tree is under 100k compressed, then
>  we can get away with just having the untrimmed tree, don't you?

The untrimmed one is 74 K for binary-i386 (including binary-all).

> 	manoj
>  wondering whether to do this for a complete hamm mirror

May the SOurce be with you.
			Mrvn


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Install size estimation (using du -S data)
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Linuxconf
Next by Date: disk method of dselect still broken
Previous by thread: Re: Size of a du index for packages (Complete index = 74 K)
Next by thread: Install size estimation (using du -S data)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread