Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem
Raul Miller writes:
> Meskes, Michael <email@example.com> wrote:
> > So I misunderstood the original mail. Yes, you were right I meant the 3
> > month development + 3 months freeze. But that one could contain some
> > development for the next version, as we do now. The problem as I see it,
> > is that there are major bugs in hamm that no one cares about, because we
> > are already working on slink. I still don't fully understand why we
> > can't get hamm out of the door.
> First time I heard about this.
> I thought that we had some people in the critical path who were
> working just as hard as they could to get hamm released.
Upong rereading my mail it sounds pretty offending, but was never meant to
be. What I wanted to say way that the open bugs are the only open problem I
was aware of. I wasn't aware of a problem with the boot disks and libc.
Besides I think we should ship with whatever version of glibc is available
and not wait for Ulrich.
I had a hard time imagining that these bugs are the only reason for the
delay, because it shouldn't be too difficult to fix them or move the package
out of the dist.
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
firstname.lastname@example.org | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
email@example.com | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com