[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem

On Thu, May 28, 1998 at 10:26:04AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Our current problem with releasing 2.0 is that we took on goals that were
> too complex for a simple release cycle. It was necessary in this case, but
> we should work harder in the future at keeping a more narrow focus on
> short term goals when working on a release. 

I'm not so sure.  It would have been possible to focus primarily on libc6
but still leave room for libc5, which was the big transition.  I think not
every package need be FHS for 2.1 though, as long as critical ones are.

Attachment: pgpTVNsh1PobU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: