Re: Pine...again

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Pine...again
From: Kikutani Makoto <kikutani@debian.or.jp>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 23:54:42 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980526235442.B8465@debian.or.jp>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.96.980524225315.10487A-100000@copland.udel.edu>; from Christopher Jason Morrone on Sun, May 24, 1998 at 10:54:11PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 19980525015930.B11627@earthlink.net> <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.96.980524225315.10487A-100000@copland.udel.edu>

I don't see the conclusion of this thread.
Is the license problem of pine fixed ?
(even though either in non-free or contrib)

I made a package of pine with a Japanese patch one month ago.
But I gave up to release it because of its license discussion.

-- 
Kikutani Makoto  kikutani@sprintmail.com
                 kikutani@debian.or.jp (Linux related only)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pine...again
  - From: "Rev. Joseph Carter" <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>

References:
- Re: Pine...again
  - From: "Rev. Joseph Carter" <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>
- Re: Pine...again
  - From: Christopher Jason Morrone <cmorrone@UDel.Edu>

Prev by Date: The broken libjpeg-6b is in RH 5.1
Next by Date: Re: Hamm CD's
Previous by thread: Re: Pine...again
Next by thread: Re: Pine...again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread