Re: ldconfig_1.9.6-3_alpha.changes INSTALLED
- To: "David Engel " <david@ods.com>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ldconfig_1.9.6-3_alpha.changes INSTALLED
- From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 08:29:38 -0700
- Message-id: <v04003a14b18b4859c3ad@[206.163.71.146]>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980522090413.A7668@elo>
- References: <v04003a05b18ab2e5a37e@[206.163.71.146]>; from Joel Klecker on Thu, May 21, 1998 at 11:49:45PM -0700 <19980521143149.26668.qmail@master.debian.org>; <19980521143149.26668.qmail@master.debian.org> <[🔎] 19980521205141.A8369@lander.es> <v04003a05b18ab2e5a37e@[206.163.71.146]>
At 09:04 -0500 1998-05-22, David Engel wrote:
>On Thu, May 21, 1998 at 11:49:45PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
>> I think a cleaner solution would be to have the 'ldconfig' package for
>> powerpc and alpha be built from the ldso source package, the 'ldconfig'
>> source package seems to be simply the ldconfig sources from ldso, perhaps
>> with patches (note that the powerpc patch I made to the 'ldconfig' sources
>> is no longer necessary). It's too late to do this for hamm, but I'd like to
>> do it for slink. I'm cc'ing ldso@packages.debian.org on this.
>
>If someone has patches for ldconfigm they need to send them me. I
>don't have access to a ppc system though.
Actually, you have an account on powerpc.debian.org.
What about the other point there, about the `ldconfig' binary package for
alpha and powerpc being built from the `ldso' source package? I'll put
together a patch to do this if you'd like.
--
Joel "Espy" Klecker
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<mailto:jk@espy.org>
<http://web.espy.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: