Re: Uploaded junkbuster 2.0-1 (source i386) to master
"Alexander E. Apke" <alex@unique.outlook.net> writes:
> Why not use port 81? I don't know if this port has been defined
This would require it to run as root, which is not necessarily a good
thing.
> or standardized yet, but it would seem logical that proxies like
> junkbuster should use it by default.
>
> Or maybe all proxies should be given a certain port range as
> debian policy.
>
>
> Alex
>
> On 19 May 1998, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> > > junkbuster (2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
> > > * default port set to 8080 as to not conflict with NAS
> > > * maintainer release
> >
> > Yes, I realize that this has been discussed recently. I just wanted to
> > put in my two cents.
> >
> > I haven't quite gotten around to evaluating junkbuster yet. I just
> > haven't had time. But with a default port of 8080 I'll probably delay
> > it longer. That's where I run my test apache servers. Admittedly, I
> > could tell probably tell junkbuster to use a different port but it won't
> > be as easy. 8000 and 8080 aren't well-known ports in the standards
> > sense but many people do use them for web servers...
> >
> > Darren
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix programming jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade) www.debian.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
``You'll notice that this scanner, Bill [Gates]...'' <Blue Screen of Death>
``Whoa!'' <Applause> ``Moving right along....'' -- Microsoft (Comdex
video at: http://cnn.com/TECH/computing/9804/20/gates.comdex/index.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: