Re: "Visual" IDE?

To: SEGV <mlepage@cgocable.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: "Visual" IDE?
From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: 04 May 1998 22:37:34 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87emy9h28h.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>
Reply-to: pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu
In-reply-to: SEGV's message of Mon, 04 May 1998 22:29:50 -0400
References: <[🔎] 354E799E.7EF75D35@cgocable.net>

   Even XEmacs with Sparcworks integration doesn't do it for me. So
   basically I use XEmacs to edit my source and make files, and the command
   line to compile. I debug with whatever debugger is best for the platform
   I am using that day.

What exactly are your objections to Emacs' compile-mode and gdb-mode?
I find them to be quite useful.  Perhaps you could write some
extensions that would make them more useful to you.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Visual" IDE?
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>

References:
- "Visual" IDE?
  - From: SEGV <mlepage@cgocable.net>

Prev by Date: "Visual" IDE?
Next by Date: Re: "Visual" IDE?
Previous by thread: "Visual" IDE?
Next by thread: Re: "Visual" IDE?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread