Re: policy suggestion (seeking discussion)
Hi,
Huh? If the maintainer wanted the file to be known to dpkg,
they could have added a zero byte file to the paclkage (getting it
listed), and then manipulated it in the post inst. *NO* need to muck
around in /var/lib/dpkg. The cat idea is a really bad idea.
How come no one pointed this out already?
The reason some packages handle some files entirely in post
inst is because they do *not* want dpkt to lay its grubby little
fingers on them.
Don't even think about changing dpkg internal files using
anything but dpkg.
manoj
--
"It's very hard for anything to make it out of Hollywood these days
without a lame-ass wimpout ending tacked on at the whining request of
test audiences selected from the most puerile of the Nielsen
families, who are, as we all know, chosen on the basis of the number
of cousin-cousin marriages in their family over the last ten
generations." Nix Thompson (nix@sgi.com)
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: