Re: Licensing (OFF-TOPIC)
- To: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu, Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il>
- Cc: dres@dimensional.com, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Licensing (OFF-TOPIC)
- From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 16:38:42 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980426163842.36206@hazel>
- Mail-followup-to: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu, Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il>, dres@dimensional.com, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 86377.3102608021@jmlb2.trin.cam.ac.uk>; from Jules Bean on Sun, Apr 26, 1998 at 07:33:41PM +0100
- References: <[🔎] 86377.3102608021@jmlb2.trin.cam.ac.uk>
Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> It is perfectly legal, apparently, to have a GPLed program use (e.g.
> shell out to) a commercial piece of software. It has to be - to
> disallow this would be very stupid indeed. And indeed, the whole idea
> of have standard APIs for program communication (like SQL, although
> that's a bad example because there's no real standard for how to
> actually send the queries) is that, I, the user, can choose which
> programs (which RDBMS, for example) to use.
Then again, it's probably not legal to ship a GPL'd program which has
hard coded into it a system call that only works with proprietary
software.
It's legal to link GPL'd software against limited use, proprietary
software. You just can't distribute it.
[Do we need a special list to discuss GPL copyright issues? This
is getting out of hand.]
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: