Re: Licensing, was elvis package
David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com> wrote:
> So why haven't we seen this enforced, or has it happend but quietly?
> I do note that there is no kemacs.., but there are things like
> krpm.. hrm.. I'd have to look at the list, but... one would think that
> at least RMS would enforce things under the FSF's protection. So are
> we missing something?
If you'd manage to read the copyright on rpm, you'd see:
(1) It's written by redhat, not fsf,
(2) It's available both under GPL and LGPL.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: