Re: Intent to package moxa radius
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Rev. Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > be GPL. An example of this is ncftp which was using it--that's a nono,
> > even though it is a simple shared library. In this instance, the GPL
> > actually hurt ncftp.
> ...
> > This is a limitation on the GPL I think, ...
>
> It's a limitation of ncftp.
>
> There's nothing preventing:
>
> (a) The authors of ncftp releasing it under terms compatible with
> GPL. [This course of action has been taken by authors of other
> pieces of software.]
In fact, this has happened. Ncftp 2.4.3 was released under the GPL, and
the author has told me that the 3.x releases will also have the same
licence.
--
Scott K. Ellis <storm@gate.net> http://www.gate.net/~storm/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: