Re: Intent to package moxa radius

[Igor Grobman <igor@digicron.com>]

>>    Anyway, could you explain to me how this advertising clause is so 
harmful?
> 
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html.

Ok, this helps.  I am still at a loss why we mention BSD as one of the "free" 
licenses in DFSG, and have no mention of this problem there.  I'll try to 
contact Moxa about this problem, but I doubt a successful outcome, since I 
think they really want to get some publicity out of making their software free 
one way or another.

Am I correct that this clause doesn't make software really non-free (DFSG 
definition) ? Or am I missing something obvious in DFSG?

Thanks.
-- 
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation....
Igor Grobman           igor@debian.org                 igor@digicron.com 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org