Re: autoconf problem
--On Wed, Apr 22, 1998 5:23 pm +0200 "Andreas Tille"
<tille@physik.uni-halle.de> wrote:
> On 22 Apr 1998, Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Do you look at ~/ ? Maybe ~/.tedy.xpm should be used if present. :)
> That seems me a little bit oversized. To make it more clear what I want
to
> do:
>
> xteddy needs four files:
> NAME_bw.xbm -> gray if libXpm isn't available
> NAME_color.xpm -> the nice Teddy if NAME==xteddy
> NAME_icon.xbm -> an icon
> NAME_mask.xbm -> the mask shape
>
> My new version of xteddy can be called via
>
> xteddy -F<NAME> ...
>
> If no `-F` parameter is given name equals to xteddy. You have to place
> this four files for one pixmap to show instead of xteddy
OK. This doesn't answer your question, but as an additional feature
request, how about if no -F is given, use argv[0]. So a hard link to
xpenguin gets the debian chap, etc...
> 1. in the current directory
> 2. in the directory defined via PIXMAP_PATH at compile time
> May be it makes sense to look for a further PATH to overwrite PIXMAP_PATH
> at runtime via environment variable. --- Do you think that this makes
> sense?
>
> How to get the PIXMAP_PATH right, if no --prefix option was given
> when invoking configure? (This was the initial question which is
> importand for other packages which I intend to package, too.)
What does debian's automatic make supply for --prefix? Nothing?
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: