Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)

To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)
From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 14:12:26 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E0yMBhK-0006rh-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 877m561nej.fsf@hasler.dhh>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980403133145.2421W-100000@dwarf.polaris.net> <[🔎] 877m561nej.fsf@hasler.dhh>

john@dhh.gt.org writes ("Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)"):
...
> But the sentence I am objecting to declares the *individual Debian
> developers* to be "members" of SPI.

This is indeed something that SPI needs to decide on.

You'll note that my drafts have this sentence marked as `rationale'.

Ian.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>
- Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)
  - From: john@dhh.gt.org

Prev by Date: Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5)
Next by Date: Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5)
Previous by thread: Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)
Next by thread: Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread