Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)
> >>>>> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Manoj> Hmmm. How about a 2:1 super majority to over ride the
> Manoj> Technical Committee, as we have now, but a 3:1 requirtement
> Manoj> to amend the constituition, once it is accepted?
> What he said. Constitutional amendment should require an *overwhelming*
> majority. 2/3 isn't quite enough IMHO.
Requiring 3:1 majority to ratify a constitutional amendment is
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org