Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 1998 at 09:30:49PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> > > > - DES (CBC)
> > > > - DES (EBC)
> > > > - PGP
> > >
> > > Sounds like non-us :(
The US regulations include software that has hooks "specifically" for
encryption. So merely being a front-end isn't enough to get it off the hook.
However the fact that it is more general than just crypto is.
It can handle arbitrary encodings including gzip, dos line-endings, etc.
So it isn't providing hooks "specifically" for encryption.
This is only my interpretation but I wouldn't worry to much about crypt++.el.
Mutt, PinePGP, Premail, etc. Are, however, probably more of an issue.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org