Re: Bug#20445: marked as done (general: frozen has packages which depend on kernel 2.1.x)
Lalo Martins wrote:
> On Mar 31, Craig Small decided to present us with:
> [...]
> > or 2.0.x (with patch). This is a fact of life for all Amateur Radio related
> > programs. I have heard recently that the upstream guys will no longer be
> > supporting 2.0.x patches for the utilities, does this mean we kill off the
> > ax25-utils (and anything else that touches the ax25 sockets?)
>
> Or maybe it's time to start doing 2.1.x packages, at least for
> experimental?
OK, I've talked to the upstream maintainer (luckily he is on irc) to get some
idea of what is going on with the ax25-utils package.
The current package, ax25-utils-2.1.42a will work with any kernel above
2.1.42 *OR* a 2.0.31 (or thereabouts) kernel with a special patch. So saying
it needs a 2.1.x kernel is not strictly correct.
I think what Debian needs is for there to be the ax25-modules so that amateurs
can just load a module and get up and running. It's going to be hard to
sync with the kernel itself though.
I would propose keeping the ax25-utils in stable, as a small matter of getting
a kernel is not beyond most people. However someone (perhaps me) should get
a ax25-module package into unstable.
As there is not going to be another ax25-module patch, I suspect that
ax25-utils-2.1.42a will be the last utils for a 2.0 kernel.
For the next utils package, I'll follow the lead of the smbfs packager, who
has similar problems, and have two sets of packages with different names.
Annoying, but neccessary.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
|@work: csmall@scooter.o.i.net, @play: vk2xlz@vk2xlz.ampr.org|
|@home: csmall@small.dropbear.id.au, @debian:csmall@debian.org|
|@web: http://www.triode.net.au/~csmall @spam:root@localhost|
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: