Re: Re^2: Are we in this for ourselves?

To: Marco.Budde@hqsys.antar.com (Marco Budde)
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re^2: Are we in this for ourselves?
From: gsstark@mit.edu (Gregory S. Stark)
Date: 19 Mar 1998 00:17:40 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] ycqemzzs1hn.fsf@portB05.Generation.NET>
In-reply-to: Marco.Budde@hqsys.antar.com's message of "18 Mar 98 18:20:00 +0100"
References: <[🔎] 7fe_9803182220@antares.antar.com>

Marco.Budde@hqsys.antar.com (Marco Budde) writes:
> Subject: Re^2: Are we in this for ourselves?

What mail user agent did you use to post this, is it a debian package?

Please report as a bug the "Re^2:" prefix; it is a violation of the GNKSA, the
appropriate RFC, and it's just a downright bad idea. 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re^2: Are we in this for ourselves?
  - From: Marco.Budde@hqsys.antar.com (Marco Budde)

Prev by Date: Uploads to Frozen failing
Next by Date: Re: What to do about checksecurity
Previous by thread: Re: Re^2: Are we in this for ourselves?
Next by thread: Packages which should be Extra
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread