Re: timezone -> timezones (why?)
On 27 Feb 1998, James Troup wrote:
> Craig Sanders <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > guy's example showed different version numbers, but it didn't show a
> > different epoch....i got the impression that guy misread the
> > question - he certainly didn't answer it.
> Blah. If you don't believe Guy then take 5 minutes and try it, but
> please don't spread FUD. It's very possible.
(didn't see your reply until now)
it's not that i didn't belive guy. it was that the example he posted
didn't actually demonstrate epochs...so i assumed that he'd misread the
false assumption. i was wrong.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .