[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: source with main & contrib targets



> James Troup wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:
> > 
> > > I may have mentioned this before; apologies. www-sql (which produces
> > > binary package www-mysql, recently renamed from www-sql) now has
> > > support for postgresql. www-pgsql can do into main (www-sql is GPL),
> > > while www-mysql belongs in contrib because of mysql.
> > > 
> > > If www-pgsql is to go into main, the source package www-sql must go
> > > into main too. But building the binary packages will try to build
> > > www-mysql too, which requires the header files and libraries from
> > > mysql. Is this a problem?
> > 
> > Yes, packages in main must not require stuff not in main to build,
> > even source packages.
> > 
> I have the same problem, but the other way around. mesa is completely
> dfsg compliant. Recently, they added support for 3dfx graphics boards.
> To compile this version, you need the glide library, which is non-free.
> For other reasons (having to do with the license on the header files in
> libglide) I have chosen not to compile this version yet. It does seem
> silly that such a useful, and free, piece of software will have to
> go into contrib if we wish to also distribute the glide based version.

Why can't you guys have two source packages - one in main and another in
contrib. The first produces completely free binary package(s) and the
other - non-free supplement (or substitutuon). 
Exactly the same situation we have with ddd, btw.

Alex Y.
-- 
   _ 
 _( )_
(     (o___           +-------------------------------------------+
 |      _ 7           |            Alexander Yukhimets            |
  \    (")            |       http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/      |
  /     \ \           +-------------------------------------------+


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: