RE: Reminder: lyx_0.12.0-0.1_i386.changes was rejected
And I will never get rid of that addition anymore?
Why isn't it possible to install the file by hand this time. After all
this is the unstable release.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl [SMTP:jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 1998 6:09 PM
> To: meskes@topsystem.de
> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Reminder: lyx_0.12.0-0.1_i386.changes was rejected
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 1998 at 04:56:23PM +0100, Meskes, Michael wrote:
> > This is just a bad naming on my part. I shouldn't have called the
> pre
> > versions 0.12.0pre?. How do I get the correctly named release
> version
> > into the archive?
>
> > > Rejected: lyx_0.12.0-0.1_i386.deb: Old version `0.12.0pre8-0.1' >=
> new
> > > version `0.12.0-0.1'.
>
> Use dpkg's epoch feature; see
> /usr/doc/dpkg/packaging.html/ch-versions.html
>
> HTH,
> Ray
> --
> PATRIOTISM A great British writer once said that if he had to choose
> between betraying his country and betraying a friend he hoped he would
> have the decency to betray his country.
>
> - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: