Re: i

[joost@rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl (joost witteveen)]

In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

[about cris-cust]:

> Another can of worms is that configuration packages should be forbidden
> in the distribution, because this could yield in 300 packages nobody is
> interested in.

Actually, I'd be in favour of configuration pacakges. OK, I'd
rather have configuration packages like "minimal-install", 
"netstuff-install", "tex-deluxe-install", than having config packages like
"joostw-cust", "joostk-cust", "marcus-cust", "bruce-cust", etc, as
new users are not very likely to know the differences between the 
latter (actually, I don't know myself what will be in "joostw-cust").

This is all untill we have the new deity, of cource.


-- 
joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org

The upstream maintainer is allowed to do things different 
than Debian, but only if he has good reasons to do so.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .