Re: over 30000 bugs in our archive (!)
On Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 10:24:11PM +0100, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, David Welton wrote:
>
> > I've got a question, which I'll post to the list in the hope that it
> > will shed light on similiar reports that other people have received.
> >
> > E: epic: binary-without-manpage ircflush.epic
> > E: epic: binary-without-manpage ircserv.epic
> > E: epic: binary-without-manpage ircserv.epic
> >
> > These just don't have man pages.. Is there some way to include taht
> > in the packaging information so that the various scripts will overlook
> > it?
>
> First of all, are these user callable commands are just internal commands?
> (Sorry, but I don't know this package.) If they are called by the user or
> sysadmin, they should have a manpage. If there is none and noone has time
> to write one you could file a bug report against your package and install
> symbolic link pointing to undocumented.7.gz instead of the manpages.
> Lintian will automatically recognize this.
>
> If these are just `internal' binaries, you should move them into
> /usr/lib/epic (or similar).
Yeah, that's where they should be. Sorry for not catching that
myself. Expect new uploads soon.
As far as epic4 though, I'll wait till a new upstream release comes
out, as they are pretty frequent. (There is a 42, but it's not real
stable, apparently).
Thanks:-)
--
David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw
Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: