Re: Dependency and priority mismatches
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> [about upgrading priorities of library packages used by high-priority packages]
>
> > In fact I think that pure-library packages should not have any priority
> > at all.
>
> Treating libraries as slave packages has some elegance, but it only
> works if all programs that use the library are registered in the
> packaging system. There is no way to guarantee this.
We don't have to guarantee that.
I was talking about Debian. In Debian, we have dpkg-shlibdeps.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNNs+iSqK7IlOjMLFAQFGOgP/X+VxqBlqfPlWbcVGH1K4lY9FldSFMN26
FjmTD4PqGq2QnKzG5kIt3Ybl2kQfKejGa21n/TP8DI47j7v4juaguSVahM/nacAO
7t7BZDLRXA0NGWKzV/QapiiTTxkH4XQ0AP8DdbEnx2WORSktVHUAEbMGoRAHSNoc
YPCjskE92C4=
=E38f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: