Re: i (was: Summary of Package Overlaps)
Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Overlap between cfs_1.3.3-1 (nonus,orphaned) and chris-cust_0.4:
> > usr/bin/i
> > Right. I wonder which is the more intuitive meaning for i.
> > Reported as #17841 to cfs and #17842 to christ-cust.
> This is namespace pollution again...
> We would need some policy preventing this.
Such a policy would be very hard to define. Consider just the
one-character commands. Which of these are namespace pollution?
(And most importantly, if it is to be policy, why?)
i and o cfs
i and l chris-cust
I think the current policy, which only addresses names when they do
overlap, is the most we can codify.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .